Pingdom vs Uptime Kuma
On the evidence we track, Uptime Kuma leads this comparison with a composite score of 57/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for api monitoring. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Pingdom
Combines automated testing from 100+ global locations with real user monitoring to provide visibility into website availability, performance, and user experience across browsers and devices.
Uptime Kuma
LeaderAn open-source application for monitoring website uptime and checking service health. Designed to be deployed on your own infrastructure via Docker or traditional server setups.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Pingdom
Pay-per-plan subscription model. 30-day free trial. Annual and monthly billing available.
- Synthetic Monitoring-
- Transaction monitoring
- Page speed monitoring
- Uptime monitoring
- Email and SMS alerting
- Maintenance windows
- +2 more
- Real User Monitoring-
- Unlimited number of sites
- Unlimited users
- Shareable reports
- Performance filtering
- 13-month data retention
- EnterpriseContact sales
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Pingdom
- Slack
- VictorOps
- OpsGenie
- PagerDuty
- HipChat
- SMS
Uptime Kuma
LeaderNot documented yet.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.