OWASP ZAP vs Veracode
On the evidence we track, Veracode leads this comparison with a composite score of 73/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for devsecops tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
OWASP ZAP
An open-source security scanner that performs dynamic analysis on web applications to detect potential vulnerabilities. It supports automation, extensibility through community add-ons, and integrates with CI/CD pipelines.
Veracode
LeaderA comprehensive platform for identifying, prioritizing, and fixing application security vulnerabilities across code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure. It combines static and dynamic testing with AI-driven remediation to reduce security risk while maintaining developer velocity.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Veracode
LeaderPricing not documented yet.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- GitHub
OWASP ZAP
- GitHub Actions
Veracode
Leader- GitLab
- AWS
- Google Cloud
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud
- Snyk
- Checkmarx
- Contrast Security
- Fortify OnDemand
- Rapid7 InsightAppSec
- Qualys
- JFrog Xray
- AWS Config
- AWS Inspector
- Prisma Cloud
- Wiz
- CrowdStrike
- Orca
- SecurityScorecard
- Terraform Cloud
OWASP ZAP or Veracode: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.