vioscale
Comparison

OpenSpace vs Raken

On the evidence we track, Raken leads this comparison with a composite score of 41/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

OpenSpace full profile →Raken full profile →
Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
OpenSpace23
★Raken41
Score
Vioscale score
OpenSpace23 / 100low · 25%
Raken41 / 100low · 38%
Pricing
Free tier
OpenSpace✗
Raken✗
Model
OpenSpacequote
Rakenquote
Price level
OpenSpaceunknown
Rakenunknown
Transparent
OpenSpace✗
Raken✗
Integrations
Count
OpenSpace4
Raken4
Security
Gdpr
OpenSpace✓
Raken–
Reliability
Status page
OpenSpace–
Raken✓
Market
Availability

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for construction management software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
Primary module
OpenSpaceField management
RakenField management
Preconstruction
BIM / IFC support
OpenSpaceCoordination + clash detection
RakenCoordination + clash detection
Estimating and quantity takeoff
OpenSpace✓
Raken✓
Documents
Document control and drawing management
OpenSpace✓
Raken✓
RFI and submittal management
OpenSpace✓
Raken✓
Scheduling
Scheduling (Gantt / CPM)
OpenSpace✓
Raken✓
Field
Safety and quality management
OpenSpace✓
Raken✓
Mobile field app
OpenSpaceMobile field app
RakenMobile field app
Integrations
Accounting / ERP integration
OpenSpace✗
Raken✓
Compliance
ISO 19650 (BIM information management) support
OpenSpace✗
Raken-
SOC 2 attested
OpenSpace✗
Raken-
Pricing
Pricing model
OpenSpace% of construction volume (ACV)
RakenQuote / contact sales
Market
Target segment
OpenSpaceGeneral contractor
Raken-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

OpenSpace

Platform for capturing construction site imagery and automatically mapping it to floor plans to help teams track progress, resolve issues, and coordinate work more effectively.

Independently observed

Raken

Leader

Raken is a web and mobile construction platform that consolidates field documentation with real-time office synchronization. It enables daily work logging, labor and equipment tracking, safety management, and document organization—helping construction companies maintain project visibility and address issues promptly.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

OpenSpace

Quote-based

Subscription pricing based on annual construction volume (ACV). Contact sales for quote.

  • CoreContact sales
    • Unlimited capture across projects
    • Visual context for issue resolution
    • BIM coordination
    • Guided onboarding
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • All Core features
    • SSO and enterprise security
    • API access
    • Premium support
    • Custom adoption support
as of verify ↗

Raken

Leader
from $23/moSubscription

From $23/user/mo (Basic) to $59/user/mo (Performance). Billed annually. 3-user minimum.

  • Basic$23/user/mo, billed annually
    • Unlimited projects
    • Directory & messaging
    • Daily activity feed
    • Real-time updates and jobsite data
    • Branded daily reports
    • +3 more
  • Performance$59/user/mo, billed annually
    • Everything in Basic
    • Time tracking
    • Production tracking
    • Safety & quality management
    • RFIs, forms, & document storage
    • +2 more
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
OpenSpace✓
Raken✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
OpenSpace✓
Raken✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (1)
  • Procore

OpenSpace

4 total - 3 not shared
  • PlanGrid
  • Autodesk
  • Revizto
Independently observed

Raken

Leader
5 total - 4 not shared
  • Autodesk BIM 360
  • Autodesk Build
  • Bluebeam
  • BIM 360
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.