Comparison
Obsidian vs Tettra
On the evidence we track, Obsidian leads this comparison with a composite score of 85/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for knowledge base software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
| Capability | Obsidian | Tettra |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | ||
| Real-time co-editing | ✓ | - |
| Content | ||
| Structured database / table blocks | - | - |
| Bidirectional links / backlinks | ✓ | - |
| Markdown-native | ✓ | ✓ |
| Version history | ✓ | ✓ |
| Storage | ||
| Local-first / offline files | ✓ | - |
| AI | ||
| AI writing / Q&A over content | - | ✓ |
| Publishing | ||
| Publish pages to the web | ✓ | ✓ |
| Access | ||
| Permissions granularity | Workspace | Page |
| Knowledge | ||
| Answer verification / expiry | - | ✓ |
| Deployment | ||
| Hosting | Cloud + self-hosted | Cloud only |
| Enterprise | ||
| SSO / SCIM | - | ✓ |
| Extensibility | ||
| Public API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | ✗ |
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.