Ninjamock vs Quant-UX
No leader: the top candidate Quant-UX has only 0.29 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for wireframing. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Ninjamock
A web-based design platform enabling teams to create wireframes and mockups with real-time collaboration, multiple device previews, and interactive prototyping capabilities. Supports exporting to PNG, HTML, and PDF formats and includes pre-built UI components for various platforms.
Quant-UX
A web-based tool that lets teams create interactive prototypes, run usability tests with real users, and collect quantitative design analytics—all without coding.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Ninjamock
Free tier available. Professional from $8/month with annual billing discount (4 free months). 70% discount for educational institutions. Accepts credit card, PayPal, and Bitcoin.
- StarterFree
- Unlimited projects
- Revision history
- Project management
- Commenting
- Real-time editing
- +2 more
- Professional$8/month (annual billing includes 4 free months). Per-user charges when adding team members.
- Unlimited projects
- Revision history
- Project management
- Commenting
- Real-time editing
- +13 more
- EnterpriseContact sales
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Ninjamock
- YouTube
- Vimeo
- Dailymotion
- Rumble
Quant-UX
Not documented yet.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.