Netsmart Technologies vs Phreesia
On the evidence we track, Phreesia leads this comparison with a composite score of 64/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for healthcare software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Netsmart Technologies
Multi-specialty EHR platform serving behavioral health, post-acute care, human services, and payer organizations across multiple care settings.
Phreesia
LeaderOperating standard for independent practices, specialty groups and health systems that powers scheduling, registration, payments and communication through AI-enabled workflows.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Netsmart Technologies
Pricing not documented yet.
Phreesia
LeaderCustom quote based on organization size and workflows. Full platform access free through end of 2026; standard pricing begins January 1, 2027.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Netsmart Technologies
- Apricot
Phreesia
Leader- Zoom
- Allscripts
- Allscripts Practice Management
- Allscripts TouchWorks
- Allscripts Professional EHR
- eClinicalWorks
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.