Microsoft Defender EASM vs Tenable Attack Surface Management
On the evidence we track, Microsoft Defender EASM leads this comparison with a composite score of 51/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for attack surface management. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Microsoft Defender EASM
LeaderA cloud-based security service that discovers internet-facing resources and identifies vulnerabilities to help organizations proactively manage their external attack surface and security risks.
Tenable Attack Surface Management
A security platform that maps an organization's internet-exposed infrastructure, services, and assets, then applies business context to help prioritize and manage external attack surface risks.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Microsoft Defender EASM
LeaderNot documented yet.
Tenable Attack Surface Management
- Splunk
Microsoft Defender EASM or Tenable Attack Surface Management: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.