Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams
On the evidence we track, Mattermost leads this comparison with a composite score of 67/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for collaboration software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Mattermost
LeaderMattermost is a self-hosted or cloud-based collaboration platform offering secure messaging, voice calling, screen sharing, workflow automation, and AI-assisted tools for teams and enterprises.
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is a video conferencing, meetings, and calling platform that enables communication, collaboration, and engagement at work. It offers instant messaging, file sharing, online meetings, webinars, and integrated workflows.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Mattermost
Leader- Slack
- Git
- Jenkins
- GitLab
- GitHub
- Bugzilla
- RSS
- Gerrit
- Redmine
- Mercurial
- SVN
- Threema
- Pexip
- Prometheus
- Grafana
- Microsoft Teams
- Matrix
- XMPP
- Trello
- ServiceNow
- PagerDuty
- Splunk
- Nagios
- +2 more
Microsoft Teams
Not documented yet.
Mattermost or Microsoft Teams: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.