lsyncd vs Pydio Cells
No leader: the top candidate Pydio Cells has only 0.18 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for file sync. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
lsyncd
Lsyncd actively watches local file systems for modifications using filesystem event interfaces, then automatically copies those changes to remote systems. It supports rsync and rsync+ssh as synchronization protocols and offers customization through configuration files and Lua scripting.
Pydio Cells
A self-hosted platform that enables organizations to manage document sharing, collaboration, and workflows with full data control, designed as an alternative to cloud solutions for enterprises with strict security and compliance requirements.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Pydio Cells
Free tier available. Paid plans are annual subscriptions starting at €3,280/year.
- HomeFree
- Storage: FileSystem, S3-compatible
- Embedded users directory
- Online preview of documents
- REST API, SDKs, WebDAV
- Mobile and desktop sync
- +1 more
- ConnectContact sales
- Everything in Home
- AD/LDAP directories support
- SSO via OpenIDConnect / OAuth2
- SSO via SAML / Azure ADFS
- Cells as OAuth2 Identity Provider
- +3 more
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Everything in Connect
- Role-based and rule-based access control
- Multi-factor authentication
- Terms of Service validation
- Exportable audit logs (CSV/XLSX)
- +7 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.