Loom vs Zulip
On the evidence we track, Loom leads this comparison with a composite score of 78/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for collaboration software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Loom
LeaderLoom is a screen and camera recording platform that lets users capture, edit, and share video messages with teams and customers. It provides AI-powered transcription, summaries, and video enhancement features to facilitate asynchronous collaboration across distributed organizations.
Zulip
Zulip is an open-source team chat platform featuring topic-based threading to organize conversations. It supports both synchronous and asynchronous workflows and offers flexible deployment options including cloud hosting or self-hosted infrastructure.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Loom
LeaderFree tier. Paid plans from $18/user/month (Business) to $24/user/month (Business + AI). Annual billing saves up to 17%. Enterprise plan requires contact.
- StarterFree
- 25 videos per person
- 5 minute screen recordings
- Unlimited meeting length
- Transcriptions in 50+ languages
- Comments and emoji reactions
- +8 more
- Business$18/user/month. Unlimited videos, 4K recording, basic editing
- Unlimited videos and recording time
- Remove Loom branding
- Upload and download videos
- High-def up to 4K video
- Basic waveform editing
- +9 more
- Business + AI$24/user/month. Includes AI enhancement and automation features
- Everything in Business, plus:
- Auto-video enhancement
- Advanced editing
- Video-to-text automation
- Auto-meeting recap emails
- +7 more
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Everything in Business + AI, plus:
- Advanced security (SSO, SCIM)
- Salesforce integration
- 99.95% uptime SLA
- EBA Compliance
- +2 more
Zulip
From free to $12/user/month (Cloud Plus). Self-hosted from $3.50/user/month.
- Zulip Cloud FreeFree
- 10,000 messages search history
- 5GB total file storage
- Complete team chat solution
- Hundreds of integrations
- Advanced roles and permissions
- +1 more
- Zulip Cloud Standard$6.67/user/month billed annually or $8/month
- Unlimited search history
- 5GB per user storage
- Custom permission groups
- Message retention policies
- Custom branding
- +2 more
- Zulip Cloud Plus$10/user/month billed annually or $12/month (minimum 10 users)
- All Standard features
- 25GB per user storage
- SAML SSO (Okta, OneLogIn)
- SCIM sync
- Custom domain
- +1 more
- Self-hosted FreeFree
- All Zulip features
- Mobile notifications (limited)
- 100% open-source
- Self-hosted Basic$3.50/user/month, $20/month off first year
- All features
- Unlimited mobile notifications
- Supports open-source development
- Self-hosted Business$6.67/user/month billed annually or $8/month (minimum 25 users), $20/month off first year
- All features
- Email and chat support
- SSO (SAML, Entra ID)
- AD/LDAP sync
- Configurable guest access
- +2 more
- Self-hosted EnterpriseContact sales
- All features
- Phone, email and chat support
- OpenID Connect SSO
- SCIM sync
- Implementation consulting
- +2 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Slack
- Jira
- GitHub
- Notion
- Zendesk
- Dropbox
- GitLab
- Salesforce
Loom
Leader- Jira Service Desk
- Confluence
- Gmail
- Upwork
- FigJam
- Intercom
- WordPress
- Google Workspace
Zulip
- Microsoft Teams
- Discord
- Mattermost
- Rocket.Chat
- Matrix
- IRC
- Bitbucket
- Asana
- Linear
- Trello
- Basecamp
- Jenkins
- CircleCI
- GitHub Actions
- Travis CI
- TeamCity
- Heroku
- Netlify
- Docker
- Kubernetes
- Ansible Tower
- Puppet
- Grafana
- +18 more
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.