Lark vs Microsoft Teams
On the evidence we track, Lark leads this comparison with a composite score of 77/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for collaboration software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Lark
LeaderA single platform where teams can communicate, hold meetings, collaborate on documents, manage projects, and leverage AI to automate workflows and generate content.
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is a video conferencing, meetings, and calling platform that enables communication, collaboration, and engagement at work. It offers instant messaging, file sharing, online meetings, webinars, and integrated workflows.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Lark
LeaderFree to $12/user/month. Free Starter tier. Annual billing saves 16.6%.
- StarterFree
- Team collaboration
- 20 users max
- 100 GB storage
- 1-on-1 video meetings
- 18 months message history
- +4 more
- Basic$6/user/month billed annually
- Team collaboration
- 500 users max
- 5 TB storage (expandable)
- 1-on-1 video meetings
- Unlimited message history
- +4 more
- ProContact sales
- Team collaboration
- 500 users max
- 15 TB storage (expandable)
- 500-participant video meetings
- Unlimited message history
- +8 more
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Team collaboration
- Unlimited users
- 15 TB + 30 GB per user storage (expandable)
- 500-participant video meetings
- Unlimited message history
- +10 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.