Kuma vs MOSN
On the evidence we track, Kuma leads this comparison with a composite score of 53/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for service mesh. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Kuma
LeaderOpen-source control plane for service mesh delivering security, observability, routing and more. Built on Envoy with support for Kubernetes, VMs, and multi-cluster deployments.
MOSN
A cloud-native network proxy platform written in Go, open-sourced by Ant Group and production-verified at scale. Supports multi-protocol communication and can integrate with Istio for Service Mesh or operate independently as a load balancer, API gateway, or Ingress controller.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Prometheus
Kuma
Leader- Grafana
- Datadog
- OpenTelemetry
MOSN
- Istio
- Envoy
- Jaeger
- Skywalking
- Holmes
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.