Comparison

Kinde vs Logto

On the evidence we track, Kinde leads this comparison with a composite score of 70/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.
★Kinde70
Logto55
Score
vioscaleAI score
Kinde70 / 100medium · 68%
Logto55 / 100medium · 69%
Pricing
Free tier
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Model
Price level
Kindemid
Logtolow
Starting price
Kinde–
Logto$24
Transparent
Kinde✓
Logto✗
Integrations
Count
Kinde5
Logto12
Security
Certifications
Kinde–
LogtoSOC 2
Disclosure policy
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Gdpr
Kinde✓
Logto–
Hipaa
Kinde✓
Logto–
Iso27001
Kinde✓
Logto–
Soc2
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Reliability
Status page
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Adoption
Dependent repos
Kinde–
Logto11
Github stars
Kinde–
Logto14,683
Activity
Commits last 30d
Kinde–
Logto100
Release
Cadence days
Kinde–
Logto29
History
Kinde–
License
Spdx
Kinde–
LogtoMPL-2.0
Language
Primary
Kinde–
Content
Faq
Kinde7 items
Logto8 items

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for auth & identity software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Deployment
Hosting
Kinde-
LogtoCloud + self-hosted
Methods
Social login
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Passwordless
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Passkeys / WebAuthn
Kinde-
Logto✓
Multi-factor auth
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Enterprise
SAML SSO
Kinde✓
Logto✓
SCIM provisioning
Kinde-
Logto✓
B2B / multi-tenancy
Kinde-
Logto✓
Standards
OpenID Connect provider
Kinde-
Logto✓
Delivery
Hosted UI
Kinde-
LogtoBoth
Access
RBAC
Kinde-
Logto✓
Licensing
Self-hostable OSS core
Kinde✓
Logto✓

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Kinde

Leader

A modern authentication platform designed to improve application security and user conversion while providing cost-effective and rapid deployment.

Independently observed

Logto

A developer-focused identity infrastructure that handles user authentication, authorization, and access control across web, mobile, and server applications. Built on standard protocols including OIDC, OAuth 2.1, and SAML with native support for multi-tenancy, enterprise single sign-on, and role-based access control.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Kinde

Leader
from $25/moSubscriptionFree tier

From $25/month. Free tier available.

  • Starter$25/month
    • 1 True Clone™
    • 10 virtual clones
    • Unlimited email support
    • Patented no-impersonation technology™
    • Free feature flags
as of verify ↗

Logto

from $24/moHybridFree tier

Free tier available; paid plans from $24/mo with token-based usage billing.

  • FreeFree
    • Audit logs
    • User management
  • ProFrom $24/mo + token usage
    • 50K free tokens per month
    • Token-based usage billing beyond free tier
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Kinde✓
Logto✓
iOS
Kinde✓
Logto✗
Android
Kinde✓
Logto✗
CLI
Kinde✗
Logto✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Kinde✓
Logto✓
Self-hosted
Kinde✗
Logto✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (1)
  • SAML

Kinde

Leader
5 total - 4 not shared
  • Stripe
  • TrustPath.io
  • Entra ID
  • GitHub Actions
Independently observed

Logto

23 total - 22 not shared
  • Google
  • Apple
  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • Facebook
  • Azure AD
  • Okta
  • Google One Tap
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Cloudflare Turnstile
  • SMS services
  • SMTP email
  • HTTPS email
  • Microsoft Azure AD
  • WhatsApp
  • Aliyun SMS
  • Aliyun Direct Mail
  • MailJunky
  • SMSBao
  • WeCom
  • OAuth
  • OIDC
Independently observed
Still deciding?

Kinde or Logto: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.