JuiceFS vs SeaweedFS
On the evidence we track, SeaweedFS leads this comparison with a composite score of 63/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for file storage. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
JuiceFS
A high-performance file system that separates metadata from data storage, enabling scalable access to cloud object storage with POSIX, HDFS, and S3 protocol compatibility. Designed for AI, big data, and cloud-native applications.
SeaweedFS
LeaderSeaweedFS is an open-source distributed storage system supporting S3-compatible object access, file systems, and analytics table formats. It combines tiered storage across local clusters and cloud providers, designed to efficiently handle billions of files with consistent O(1) access performance.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
JuiceFS
- AWS
- Google Cloud Storage
- Alibaba Cloud OSS
- Tencent Cloud COS
- Redis
- PostgreSQL
- TiKV
- MySQL
- SQLite
- Kubernetes
- Docker
- Podman
- Hadoop
- AWS Marketplace
- Prometheus
- Grafana
- Pyroscope
- Graphite
SeaweedFS
Leader- DuckDB
- Apache Spark
- Trino
- Dremio
- RisingWave
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.