Comparison

InVision vs UXPin

On the evidence we track, UXPin leads this comparison with a composite score of 67/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
InVision56
UXPin67
Score
Vioscale score
InVision56 / 100medium · 70%
UXPin67 / 100medium · 73%
Pricing
Free tier
InVision
UXPin
Model
InVisionfreemium
Price level
InVisionlow
UXPinmid
Transparent
InVision
UXPin
Integrations
Count
InVision250
UXPin12
Security
Disclosure policy
InVision
UXPin
Gdpr
InVision
UXPin
Iso27001
InVision
UXPin
Pci
InVision
UXPin
Soc2
InVision
UXPin
Reliability
Status page
InVision
UXPin

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ui/ux & prototyping tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Design
Vector UI design
InVision
UXPin
Component / design-system libraries
InVision-
UXPin
Auto layout / responsive
InVision-
UXPin
Prototyping
Clickable prototyping
InVision-
UXPin
Advanced interactions (variables / conditions)
InVision-
UXPin
Collaboration
Real-time multiplayer collaboration
InVision
UXPin
Handoff
Dev handoff / spec export
InVision-
UXPin
Platform
Platform breadth (Web / macOS / Windows / Linux / self-hosted)
InVisionWeb
UXPinWeb-based with Git, Storybook, and npm library sync
Licensing
Self-hostable / open-source
InVision-
UXPin
AI
AI design assist
InVision
UXPin
Pricing
Pricing model
InVisionFreemium
UXPinFreemium
Ecosystem
Plugin / community ecosystem
InVision250+ integrations
UXPinFigma plugin, Sketch import, Storybook integration, Git sync, extensive open-sou

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

InVision

A canvas-based platform that integrates AI research outputs, enabling teams to review findings, align on direction, and create roadmaps and diagrams collaboratively.

Independently observed

UXPin

Leader

UXPin lets designers and developers create interactive prototypes using actual code-backed components from Git repositories, design systems, or open-source libraries. You design visually but work with genuine components, then export clean code ready for development.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

InVision

Free tier
as of verify ↗

UXPin

Leader
from $29/moSubscriptionFree tier14-day trial

From $29/seat/month (annual) to custom Enterprise. 14-day free trial. Free plan available.

  • FreeFree
    • AI prototyping assistant
    • UI templates
    • Unlimited viewers and commenters
    • Password-protected previews
    • Basic design library
  • Core$49/seat/month or $29/seat/month billed annually (40% discount)
    • Basic AI model (GPT 5-mini)
    • Unlimited prototypes
    • Built-in coded libraries (MUI with 20 components)
    • Conditional logic and variables
    • Custom fonts
    • +3 more
  • Growth$69/seat/month or $40/seat/month billed annually (40% discount). Most popular plan.
    • Advanced AI model (GPT 5-mini, 5.1, Claude Haiku 4.5)
    • All Core features
    • Design patterns
    • Role-based permissions
    • Design system integration
    • +5 more
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • All Growth features
    • Custom AI models and credits
    • Git repository sync
    • Custom design system library integration
    • Dedicated account manager
    • +4 more
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
InVision
UXPin
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
InVision
UXPin

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

InVision

2 total
  • Claude
  • NotebookLM
Independently observed

UXPin

Leader
12 total
  • Storybook
  • Git
  • Figma
  • Sketch
  • FullStory
  • Jira
  • Slack
  • MUI
  • Bootstrap
  • Tailwind
  • Ant Design
  • Shadcn/ui
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.