Comparison

Inngest vs NATS

On the evidence we track, NATS leads this comparison with a composite score of 68/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.
Inngest56
★NATS68
Score
vioscaleAI score
Inngest56 / 100medium · 69%
NATS68 / 100medium · 58%
Pricing
Free tier
Inngest✓
NATS✓
Model
Price level
Inngestlow
NATSfree
Transparent
Inngest✗
NATS–
Integrations
Count
Inngest3
NATS12
Reliability
Status page
Inngest✓
NATS–
Adoption
Dependent repos
Inngest2
NATS24,884
Github stars
Inngest5,939
NATS20,867
Package downloads weekly
Activity
Commits last 30d
Inngest100
NATS100
Release
Cadence days
Inngest4
NATS1
History
Inngest20 items
License
Spdx
Language
Primary
InngestGo
NATSGo
Market
Availability
Inngest–
Content
Faq
Inngest7 items

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for message queues. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
Messaging paradigm
InngestDurable execution
NATSPub/sub
Correctness
Delivery guarantee
InngestAt-least-once
NATS-
Ordering guarantee
Inngest-
NATS-
Durability
Durable replayable log
Inngest✓
NATS✓
Message replay / rewind
Inngest✓
NATS✓
Interop
Wire protocol
InngestHTTPS
NATS-
Kafka-protocol compatible
Inngest✗
NATS-
Scale
Partitioned horizontal scaling
Inngest✓
NATS✓
Geo / cross-region replication
Inngest-
NATS✓
Consumption
Consumer groups / competing consumers
Inngest✗
NATS✓
Dead-letter queue
Inngest-
NATS-
Deployment
Managed cloud offering exists
Inngest✓
NATS✓
Hosting
InngestCloud + self-hosted
NATSSelf-hosted only
Processing
Built-in stream processing
Inngest✗
NATS-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Inngest

Inngest enables developers to write durable functions with built-in checkpointing and retry logic that survive failures. Functions execute step-by-step with automatic recovery and detailed observability, eliminating the need for manual infrastructure management.

Independently observed

NATS

Leader

An open-source, lightweight messaging platform that combines pub/sub, request/reply, and persistent streaming capabilities into a single system for building high-performance distributed applications.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Inngest

from $0.50/moSubscriptionFree tier

Free tier available. Pro from $99/mo + metered usage.

  • HobbyFree
    • 50k executions
    • 5 concurrent executions
    • 500 MB span data ingested
    • 10K scores
    • 500k events ingested
    • +6 more
  • ProStarting at $99/mo + metered usage
    • 1M executions included
    • Pay as you go up to 20M
    • 100+ concurrent executions
    • 5 GB span data ingested
    • 50K scores
    • +8 more
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • Custom executions
    • Custom concurrent executions
    • Custom span data ingested
    • Custom scores
    • Custom events ingested
    • +5 more
as of verify ↗

NATS

Leader
Open sourceFree tier
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Inngest✓
NATS✓
CLI
Inngest✓
NATS✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Inngest✓
NATS✓
Self-hosted
Inngest✓
NATS✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Inngest

6 total
  • Datadog
  • Vercel
  • OpenAI
  • Discord
  • Deno
  • PostgreSQL
Independently observed

NATS

Leader
12 total
  • Stripe
  • Apache Kafka
  • Apache Spark
  • Apache Flink
  • RabbitMQ
  • Prometheus
  • RisingWave
  • Caddy
  • Deepstream
  • Synadia
  • Gatling
  • Yii
Independently observed
Still deciding?

Inngest or NATS: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.