Icinga vs Nagios
No leader: the top candidate Nagios has only 0.17 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for network monitoring. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Icinga
A free, open-source monitoring system with components for core monitoring, configuration management, database persistence, web UI, and incident notifications. Designed for self-hosted deployment with emphasis on transparency and community collaboration.
Nagios
A free, community-supported monitoring system that helps organizations detect infrastructure issues and prevent downtime by monitoring servers, networks, applications, and services. It offers a modular plugin architecture for extensibility and includes optional web-based dashboards and visualization tools.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Icinga
Not documented yet.
Nagios
- Grafana
- InfluxDB
- Prometheus
- Apache
- Nginx
- IIS
- Tomcat
- MySQL
- PostgreSQL
- Oracle
- SQL Server
- MongoDB
- LDAP
- Active Directory
- JBoss
- WebLogic
- Citrix
- PagerDuty
- Slack
- ServiceNow
- DB2
- EC2
- VMware
- Hyper-V
- +2 more
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.