Horos vs PostDICOM
On the evidence we track, PostDICOM leads this comparison with a composite score of 57/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for medical imaging pacs. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Horos
Horos is a no-cost, open-source viewer for diagnostic medical images on Apple computers. It provides secure cloud-based study sharing and has been developed and maintained by a global open-source community.
PostDICOM
LeaderA cloud-based medical imaging platform that stores, manages, and shares diagnostic images (DICOM and non-DICOM formats) with secure access, advanced viewing tools, and integration capabilities. No local server infrastructure required.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Horos
Not documented yet.
PostDICOM
Leader- FHIR
- HL7
- DICOMweb
- API
- EMR
- EHR
- HIS
- RIS
- CIS
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.