Home Assistant vs Uptime Kuma
On the evidence we track, Uptime Kuma leads this comparison with a composite score of 50/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Features
The capabilities each product documents. These tools do not share a category taxonomy, so this aligns what each vendor states rather than a normalised feature set.
| Feature | Home Assistant | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Json schema assertions | - | ✓ |
| Self hostable | - | ✓ |
| Status page hosting | - | ✓ |
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Home Assistant
A freely-available home automation solution that runs entirely on local hardware, allowing users to connect and control smart devices while keeping data on-premises and private.
Uptime Kuma
LeaderA self-hosted monitoring solution that tracks the availability of websites and services across multiple protocols and endpoints, with flexible alerting through numerous notification channels.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Discord
Home Assistant
- Huawei LTE
- NodeRed
Uptime Kuma
Leader- Slack
- Telegram
- Gotify
- Pushover
Home Assistant or Uptime Kuma: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.