Hazelcast vs Upstash
On the evidence we track, Upstash leads this comparison with a composite score of 74/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for key-value stores. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Hazelcast
Hazelcast is a distributed data platform that provides real-time processing and continuous intelligence capabilities. It supports clustering and integrates with various frameworks and clients.
Upstash
LeaderA cloud platform offering serverless Redis, vector databases, message queues, and workflow orchestration designed for developers building serverless applications, with usage-based and fixed-rate pricing options.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Upstash
LeaderPay-as-you-go from $0 idle + $0.20 per 100K commands; fixed plans from $10–$1,500/month; enterprise available
- Pay-as-you-goFree
- 1 GB storage included
- Automatic scaling
- Per-request billing
- No minimum charge when idle
- Fixed Plans$10 to $1,500/month depending on tier
- Entry plan: 250 MB storage, 50 GB bandwidth
- High-end plan: 500 GB storage, 20 TB bandwidth, 16k commands/sec
- No per-command billing
- Predictable costs
- EnterpriseContact sales
- 100K+ commands per second
- Custom SLA
- Dedicated support
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- MongoDB
Hazelcast
- Spring Integration
Upstash
Leader- Cloudflare Workers
- Auth0
- MySQL
- PostgreSQL
- Debezium
- JDBC
- FluentBit
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.