Harvey vs iManage
On the evidence we track, Harvey leads this comparison with a composite score of 60/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for legal software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Harvey
LeaderA collaborative AI platform enabling law firms and in-house legal teams to manage client matters, contracts, and documents on a unified system. It provides AI agents to automate routine work, extract document insights, and orchestrate complex legal workflows.
iManage
A cloud-native platform for document and email management, security governance, risk and compliance, and knowledge search with AI-powered capabilities for legal and professional services organizations.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Harvey
Leader- Microsoft SharePoint
- Microsoft OneDrive
- Microsoft Word
- Microsoft Outlook
- Microsoft 365 Copilot
- Microsoft Teams
- NetDocuments
iManage
- Microsoft
- Microsoft 365
- OpenAI
- Harvey
- Legora
- Anthropic
- HYCU
Harvey or iManage: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.