Greptile vs Reviewable
On the evidence we track, Greptile leads this comparison with a composite score of 65/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for code review tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Greptile
LeaderA code review assistant powered by artificial intelligence that analyzes pull requests with full knowledge of your project, identifies bugs and issues, and proposes fixes. Teams can define custom rules to enforce their coding standards.
Reviewable
A code review tool that helps engineering teams streamline pull request reviews on GitHub by reducing interruptions, preventing duplicate reviews through intelligent change tracking, and providing customizable merge policies.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Greptile
LeaderFree Starter plan. Pro from $30/seat/month with 50 credits included.
- StarterFree
- Unlimited repositories
- 50 credits per month
- 1 active developer
- Pro$30/seat/month with 50 credits included; $1 per additional credit
- 50 credits per seat included
- Additional credits at $1 each
- Unlimited users
- Create custom rules
- Connect unlimited external apps
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Custom pricing
- Self-hosted deployment option
- SSO/SAML
- GitHub Enterprise support
- Dedicated Slack channel support
- +2 more
Reviewable
Pricing not documented yet.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- GitHub
Greptile
Leader- GitLab
- Claude Code
- OpenAI Codex
- Cursor
- Conductor
- Devin
- Jira
- Notion
Reviewable
- GitHub
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.