Grafana Tempo vs SigNoz
On the evidence we track, Grafana Tempo leads this comparison with a composite score of 64/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for distributed tracing tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Grafana Tempo
LeaderAn open-source distributed tracing platform that stores trace data using affordable object storage rather than specialized databases, making it simpler and cheaper to operate while integrating with Grafana and other observability tools.
SigNoz
Open-source observability platform that brings together application telemetry—logs, metrics, and distributed traces—in a single interface, built natively around OpenTelemetry instrumentation. Available as a managed cloud service or self-deployed within your own infrastructure.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Grafana Tempo
LeaderOpen source (free). Grafana Cloud integration from $19/month or $25k/year enterprise.
- Open SourceFree
- Grafana Cloud Pro$19/mo
- Platform fee includes limited trace retention and usage
- 30 days retention for traces
- 8x5 email support
- Grafana Cloud EnterpriseContact sales
- Custom retention
- Premium support
- Deployment flexibility (Public Cloud, Federal Cloud, Bring Your Own Cloud)
SigNoz
Usage-based cloud pricing from $49/month with 30-day free trial; free open-source self-hosted option.
- SigNoz CloudFrom $49/month, usage-based pricing with 30-day free trial
- logs
- metrics
- traces
- alerts
- dashboards
- +2 more
- Enterprise CloudContact sales
- SOC 2 Type II
- HIPAA compliance
- RBAC
- ingestion controls
- custom retention
- +3 more
- BYOCContact sales
- SOC 2 Type II
- HIPAA compliance
- RBAC
- ingestion controls
- custom retention
- +1 more
- Enterprise Self-HostedContact sales
- SOC 2 Type II
- HIPAA compliance
- RBAC
- ingestion controls
- custom retention
- +1 more
- Open-Source Self-HostedFree
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Prometheus
- OpenTelemetry
Grafana Tempo
Leader- Grafana
- Loki
- Jaeger
- Zipkin
- OpenCensus
- Kafka
- Amazon S3
- Google Cloud Storage
- Microsoft Azure
SigNoz
- Apache
- HAProxy
- Elasticsearch
- RabbitMQ
- Open WebUI
- DSPy
- HCP Vault
- OpenTelemetry eBPF
- Langflow
- Cohere
- Auth0
- PgBouncer
- Kubernetes
- Git
- Jira
- Google Chat
- Slack
- PagerDuty
- Opsgenie
- MS Teams
- OpenTelemetry Collector
- AWS CloudWatch
- incident.io
Grafana Tempo or SigNoz: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.