gqlgen vs Hasura
No clear leader: gqlgen (57.6) and Hasura (56.5) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for graphql tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
gqlgen
An open-source Go framework that generates GraphQL server code from schema definitions. It emphasizes type safety, automatic code generation to reduce boilerplate, and a schema-first development approach.
Hasura
A GraphQL server that creates APIs from multiple data sources including databases and external APIs, offering real-time capabilities and role-based access control. Developers can query data across distributed sources as if from a single database.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
gqlgen
Not documented yet.
Hasura
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Elasticsearch
- SQL Server
- MongoDB
- Snowflake
- Clickhouse
- MS SQL Server
gqlgen or Hasura: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.