Comparison

Google Cloud Service Mesh vs Kuma

On the evidence we track, Google Cloud Service Mesh leads this comparison with a composite score of 69/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Google Cloud Service Mesh69
Kuma53
Score
Vioscale score
Google Cloud Service Mesh69 / 100low · 41%
Kuma53 / 100low · 36%
Pricing
Free tier
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Model
Google Cloud Service Meshfreemium
Price level
Google Cloud Service Meshlow
Kumafree
Transparent
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Integrations
Count
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma4
Security
Disclosure policy
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Gdpr
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Scorecard
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma8.3
Reliability
Status page
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Adoption
Dependent repos
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma8
Github stars
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma3,995
Activity
Commits last 30d
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma100
Release
History
Google Cloud Service Mesh
License
Spdx
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Language
Primary
Google Cloud Service Mesh
KumaGo
Market
Availability
Google Cloud Service Mesh

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for service mesh. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Architecture
Data plane
Google Cloud Service MeshSidecar
KumaSidecar
Proxy
Google Cloud Service MeshEnvoy
KumaEnvoy
Security
Automatic mutual TLS
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
SPIFFE / SPIRE identity
Google Cloud Service Mesh-
Kuma-
Traffic
Traffic splitting / canary
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Fault injection / resilience
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Scale
Multi-cluster federation
Google Cloud Service Mesh-
Kuma
Portability
VM support (beyond Kubernetes)
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Observability
Built-in observability
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Standards
Gateway API / GAMMA support
Google Cloud Service Mesh-
Kuma
Extensibility
WASM extensibility
Google Cloud Service Mesh-
Kuma-
Compliance
FIPS mode
Google Cloud Service Mesh-
Kuma-
Ecosystem
CNCF maturity
Google Cloud Service Mesh-
KumaSandbox
Ops
Commercial support / enterprise edition
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Google Cloud Service Mesh

Leader

A fully managed service mesh platform that unifies service mesh across VMs, containers, and serverless applications with traffic management, security, and fault injection capabilities.

Independently observed

Kuma

Open-source control plane for service mesh delivering security, observability, routing and more. Built on Envoy with support for Kubernetes, VMs, and multi-cluster deployments.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Google Cloud Service Mesh

Leader
from $0.00/moUsage-basedFree tier

From $0.50/client/month. Free trial available.

  • Pay-as-you-go$0.50/client/month (~$0.0006945/hour)
    • Telemetry dashboards
    • Cloud Service Mesh standard metrics
    • Managed control plane
    • Mesh CA (managed certificate authority)
as of verify ↗

Kuma

Open sourceFree tier

Open-source with enterprise offerings available (demo on request)

as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
CLI
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Self-hosted
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
On-premise
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma
Hybrid
Google Cloud Service Mesh
Kuma

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Google Cloud Service Mesh

Leader

Not documented yet.

Kuma

4 total
  • Prometheus
  • Grafana
  • Datadog
  • OpenTelemetry
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.