GitLab CI/CD vs TeamCity
On the evidence we track, GitLab CI/CD leads this comparison with a composite score of 60/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ci/cd tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
GitLab CI/CD
LeaderAn integrated platform combining source control, continuous integration/deployment, and built-in security scanning to automate the entire software delivery lifecycle with support for both cloud and self-hosted deployments.
TeamCity
TeamCity is a continuous integration and deployment tool that connects to multiple version control providers, offers command-line and programmatic access for pipeline management, and can run on your infrastructure or in the cloud.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Slack
GitLab CI/CD
Leader- AWS Marketplace
- Google Cloud Marketplace
- AWS
- Google Cloud Platform
- Kubernetes
- Docker
- LDAP
- OAuth
- Jenkins
- Jira
- SAML
- Anchore
- Prisma Cloud
- Checkmarx
- CodeSecure
- Fortify
- Venafi
- Veracode
- Akismet
- reCAPTCHA
TeamCity
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Bitbucket
- Perforce
- Qodana
GitLab CI/CD or TeamCity: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.