Gitea vs Sapling
On the evidence we track, Gitea leads this comparison with a composite score of 56/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for version control. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Gitea
LeaderGitea is an open-source DevOps platform that provides Git repository hosting, code review, CI/CD pipelines via integrated Gitea Actions, and multi-format package management. It supports both cloud-hosted and self-managed deployments on Linux, Windows, macOS, and Kubernetes.
Sapling
An open-source version control system from Meta designed to work with Git repositories, offering both command-line and web-based interfaces for managing code and code review workflows.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Gitea
LeaderFree open-source tier or from $9.50/user/month for enterprise
- Open SourceFree
- Code hosting
- Issue tracking
- Pull requests
- Project management
- Gitea Actions (CI/CD)
- +2 more
- EnterpriseFrom $9.50/user/month (1-year annual commitment)
- All Free features
- SAML SSO Integration
- Audit Logs
- Kubernetes AutoScaling Runners
- Priority security bug fix notifications
- +3 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Gitea
Leader- GitHub Actions
- Slack
- Cargo
- Chef
- Composer
- Conan
- Conda
- Container
- Helm
- Maven
- NPM
- NuGet
- Pub
- PyPI
- RubyGems
- Vagrant
- SQLite
- MySQL
- PostgreSQL
- TiDB
- MS SQL
Sapling
- GitHub
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.