Gavel vs Relativity
On the evidence we track, Gavel leads this comparison with a composite score of 84/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for legal software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Gavel
LeaderA legal technology platform with two main products: an AI contract analysis and drafting tool that operates inside Microsoft Word, and a document automation system that converts client intake answers into finished legal documents. Designed to reduce time spent on repetitive legal work.
Relativity
RelativityOne is an AI-driven platform designed to help legal teams organize and analyze complex legal data at scale. It includes specialized AI products for document review, privilege identification, case strategy, and data breach response.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Gavel
LeaderFrom $160/user/month for Gavel Exec. Free trial with 25 queries per user.
- Gavel ExecFree
- Contract review and redlining in Word
- Contract drafting from precedent
- Playbook-driven analysis
- Team collaboration in Workspaces
Relativity
Flexible, predictable pricing; pay-as-you-go or commit 1-3 years for savings
- RelativityOneContact sales
- Relativity aiR for Review
- aiR for Privilege
- aiR for Case Strategy
- Document extraction and classification
- 24/7 Global Support
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Gavel
Leader- Microsoft Word
- OpenAI
- Clio
- Lawmatics
- Gmail
- InfoTrack
- QuickBooks
- Trello
- Zapier
Relativity
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Microsoft
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.