Comparison

FOSSBilling vs Metronome

On the evidence we track, Metronome leads this comparison with a composite score of 68/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

FOSSBilling full profile →Metronome full profile →

Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.

FOSSBilling44

★Metronome68

Attribute comparison across 2 tools
Attribute	FOSSBilling	MetronomeLeader
vioscaleAI score	44 / 100low · 39%	68 / 100medium · 74%
Pricing
Free tierpricing.free_tier	✓	✗
Modelpricing.model	open_source	commercial
Price levelpricing.price_level	free	low
Starting pricepricing.starting_price	-	$0.04
Transparentpricing.transparent	✓	✓
Integrations
Countintegrations.count	4	9
Security
Certificationssecurity.certifications	-	SOC 2 Type 2
Iso27001security.iso27001	-	✓
Pcisecurity.pci	-	✓
Soc2security.soc2	-	✓
Trust centersecurity.trust_center	-	https://metronome.com/company/security
Reliability
Status pagereliability.status_page	✓	✓
Adoption
Github starsadoption.github_stars	16	-
Activity
Commits last 30dactivity.commits_last_30d	26	-
License
Spdxlicense.spdx	AGPL-3.0	-
Language
Primarylanguage.primary	Astro	-
Market
Availabilitymarket.availability	-	Available worldwide
Content
Faqcontent.faq	6 items	5 items

Score

vioscaleAI score

FOSSBilling44 / 100low · 39%

Metronome68 / 100medium · 74%

Pricing

Free tier

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✗

Model

FOSSBillingopen_source

Metronomecommercial

Price level

FOSSBillingfree

Metronomelow

Starting price

FOSSBilling–

Metronome$0.04

Transparent

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✓

Integrations

Count

FOSSBilling4

Metronome9

Security

Certifications

FOSSBilling–

MetronomeSOC 2 Type 2

Iso27001

FOSSBilling–

Metronome✓

Pci

FOSSBilling–

Metronome✓

Soc2

FOSSBilling–

Metronome✓

Trust center

FOSSBilling–

Metronomehttps://metronome.com/company/security

Reliability

Status page

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✓

Adoption

Github stars

FOSSBilling16

Metronome–

Activity

Commits last 30d

FOSSBilling26

Metronome–

License

Spdx

FOSSBillingAGPL-3.0

Metronome–

Language

Primary

FOSSBillingAstro

Metronome–

Market

Availability

FOSSBilling–

MetronomeAvailable worldwide

Content

Faq

FOSSBilling6 items

Metronome5 items

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for billing & invoicing software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capability comparison for Billing & Invoicing Software
Capability	FOSSBilling	Metronome
Core
Subscription billing	✓	✓
Usage metering	-	Real-time
Pricing models	-	usage-based
Invoicing & AR	✓	✓
Catalog management	-	✓
Commerce
Merchant of record	-	-
Finance
Revenue recognition	-	Integration
Tax handling	-	Integration
Collections
Dunning	-	-
Integrations
GL / ERP sync	-	✓
Ecosystem
API-first / developer-first	-	✓
Deployment
Self-hostable	✓	✗
Insight
Revenue analytics	-	✓

Core

Subscription billing

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✓

Usage metering

FOSSBilling-

MetronomeReal-time

Pricing models

FOSSBilling-

Metronomeusage-based

Invoicing & AR

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✓

Catalog management

FOSSBilling-

Metronome✓

Commerce

Merchant of record

FOSSBilling-

Metronome-

Finance

Revenue recognition

FOSSBilling-

MetronomeIntegration

Tax handling

FOSSBilling-

MetronomeIntegration

Collections

Dunning

FOSSBilling-

Metronome-

Integrations

GL / ERP sync

FOSSBilling-

Metronome✓

Ecosystem

API-first / developer-first

FOSSBilling-

Metronome✓

Deployment

Self-hostable

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✗

Insight

Revenue analytics

FOSSBilling-

Metronome✓

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

FOSSBilling

A free, open-source platform that enables hosting automation businesses to manage customer accounts, billing, invoicing, and client administration without proprietary licensing costs.

Independently observed

Metronome

Leader

A real-time monetization platform providing metering, pricing, billing, and reporting unified in one platform, built for product-led scale and sales-led complexity.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

FOSSBilling

Open sourceFree tier

as of 2026-08-13verify ↗

Metronome

Leader

from $0.04/eventsHybrid

Usage-based pricing at 0.8% on billing volume plus $0.04 per 1,000 events; custom enterprise plans available

Startup0.8% on billing volume + $0.04 per 1,000 events
- Real-time usage metering and alerting
- Usage-based, seat-based, subscription, and hybrid pricing support
- Self-serve and custom enterprise contracts
- Native Stripe integration
- Embeddable billing dashboards
CustomContact sales
- Invoicing integrations with Salesforce, NetSuite, and Cloud Marketplaces (AWS, Azure, GCP)
- Data exports to data warehouse and BI tools
- Dedicated account manager
- Enhanced SLAs and priority support

as of 2026-09-18verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platform and deployment support comparison
Supports	FOSSBilling	Metronome
WebPlatforms	✓	✓
Cloud / SaaSDeployment	✗	✓
Self-hostedDeployment	✓	✗

Platforms

Web

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✓

Deployment

Cloud / SaaS

FOSSBilling✗

Metronome✓

Self-hosted

FOSSBilling✓

Metronome✗

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

FOSSBilling

4 total

cPanel
Plesk
DirectAdmin
HestiaCP

Independently observed

Metronome

Leader

9 total

Salesforce
NetSuite
Stripe
AWS Marketplace
Google Cloud Marketplace
Microsoft Azure Marketplace
Clickhouse
Google Cloud Storage
SingleStore

Independently observed

Still deciding?

FOSSBilling or Metronome: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.