FormatJS vs Lokalise
On the evidence we track, Lokalise leads this comparison with a composite score of 67/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for localization i18n. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
FormatJS
A monorepo hosting FormatJS libraries, with react-intl as a primary component. Provides tools for implementing internationalization and localization functionality in JavaScript applications.
Lokalise
LeaderA software localization platform that helps development teams manage multilingual content by processing translation files and offering API-based integration options
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
FormatJS
Pricing not documented yet.
Lokalise
LeaderFrom $375/mo. Free 14-day trial.
- StarterFree
- Growth$375/mo
- Advanced$999/mo
- EnterpriseContact sales
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
FormatJS
Not documented yet.
Lokalise
Leader- WordPress
- Asana
- Figma
- Jira
- GitHub
- Trello
- Salesforce
- Salesforce Sales Cloud
- Salesforce Knowledge
- Salesforce Marketing Cloud
- Amazon S3
- Google Cloud Storage
- Okta
FormatJS or Lokalise: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.