Forgejo vs Gogs
No leader: the top candidate Forgejo has only 0.05 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for version control. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Forgejo
Open-source platform for managing software projects and collaborative development. Can be deployed as a cloud-hosted instance or self-hosted, offering a GitHub-like experience with lower resource requirements and built-in federation support.
Gogs
A lightweight Git hosting solution designed for self-hosted deployment with minimal resource requirements and cross-platform support.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Forgejo
Not documented yet.
Gogs
- Slack
- Discord
- Dingtalk
- GitHub
- GitHub Enterprise
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- MariaDB
- SQLite3
Forgejo or Gogs: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.