Comparison

Foreman vs Landscape

On the evidence we track, Landscape leads this comparison with a composite score of 58/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Foreman full profile →Landscape full profile →

Machine formatsJSON Markdown GraphQLor send Accept: application/json

Foreman49

★Landscape58

Attribute comparison across 2 tools
Attribute	Foreman	LandscapeLeader
Vioscale score	49 / 100low · 17%	58 / 100medium · 56%
Pricing
Free tierpricing.free_tier	-	✓
Modelpricing.model	open_source	freemium
Price levelpricing.price_level	free	mid
Transparentpricing.transparent	-	✓
Integrations
Countintegrations.count	15	6
Security
Disclosure policysecurity.disclosure_policy	✓	-
Fedrampsecurity.fedramp	-	✓
Gdprsecurity.gdpr	✓	✓
Iso27001security.iso27001	-	✓
Pcisecurity.pci	-	✓
Market
Availabilitymarket.availability	-	Available worldwide · HQ GB

Score

Vioscale score

Foreman49 / 100low · 17%

Landscape58 / 100medium · 56%

Pricing

Free tier

Foreman–

Landscape✓

Model

Foremanopen_source

Landscapefreemium

Price level

Foremanfree

Landscapemid

Transparent

Foreman–

Landscape✓

Integrations

Count

Foreman15

Landscape6

Security

Disclosure policy

Foreman✓

Landscape–

Fedramp

Foreman–

Landscape✓

Gdpr

Foreman✓

Landscape✓

Iso27001

Foreman–

Landscape✓

Pci

Foreman–

Landscape✓

Market

Availability

Foreman–

LandscapeAvailable worldwide · HQ GB

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for configuration management tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capability comparison for Configuration Management Tools
Capability	Foreman	Landscape
Core
Architecture	-	Agent-based
Push / pull model	Both	Both
Config language	-	-
Deployment
Masterless mode	-	✗
Hosting	Self-hosted only	Cloud + self-hosted
Correctness
Idempotent	-	✓
Model
Desired-state declarative	✓	✓
Ecosystem
Content registry	-	✓
Platform
Windows support	-	✗
Scope
Cloud provisioning	✓	-
Governance
Policy / compliance	-	✓
Commercial
Enterprise edition	-	✓
Licensing
Open-source core	✓	✗

Core

Architecture

Foreman-

LandscapeAgent-based

Push / pull model

ForemanBoth

LandscapeBoth

Config language

Foreman-

Landscape-

Deployment

Masterless mode

Foreman-

Landscape✗

Hosting

ForemanSelf-hosted only

LandscapeCloud + self-hosted

Correctness

Idempotent

Foreman-

Landscape✓

Model

Desired-state declarative

Foreman✓

Landscape✓

Ecosystem

Content registry

Foreman-

Landscape✓

Platform

Windows support

Foreman-

Landscape✗

Scope

Cloud provisioning

Foreman✓

Landscape-

Governance

Policy / compliance

Foreman-

Landscape✓

Commercial

Enterprise edition

Foreman-

Landscape✓

Licensing

Open-source core

Foreman✓

Landscape✗

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Foreman

A server lifecycle management tool that orchestrates provisioning, configuration management, and monitoring for both on-premise and cloud infrastructure. It provisions bare-metal and virtual servers from multiple cloud providers and integrates with configuration management tools to deploy and monitor server configurations.

Independently observed

Landscape

Leader

A centralized management tool for Linux infrastructure that automates security patching, compliance auditing, and system administration tasks. Available as a cloud service or self-hosted deployment, with support for isolated and air-gapped environments.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Foreman

Open source

as of 2026-08-13verify ↗

Landscape

Leader

from $25/moSubscriptionFree tier30-day trial

Free for personal use (up to 5 machines). From $25/machine/year for Ubuntu Pro. Premium managed Landscape services from $3,099–$9,470/year.

PersonalFree
- Landscape SaaS
- Security patch automation
- Compliance task management
Workstation$25/machine/year
- Landscape SaaS
- Security patching
- System monitoring
Server$500/server/year
- Landscape SaaS
- Unlimited VM support
- Infrastructure management
Enterprise 24/7 Support$3,400/server/year for full support
- Landscape SaaS
- 24/7 enterprise support
- Full stack coverage

as of 2026-08-13verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platform and deployment support comparison
Supports	Foreman	Landscape
WebPlatforms	✓	✓
CLIPlatforms	✓	✓
Cloud / SaaSDeployment	✓	✓
Self-hostedDeployment	✓	✓
HybridDeployment	✓	✗
Air-gappedDeployment	✗	✓

Platforms

Web

Foreman✓

Landscape✓

CLI

Foreman✓

Landscape✓

Deployment

Cloud / SaaS

Foreman✓

Landscape✓

Self-hosted

Foreman✓

Landscape✓

Hybrid

Foreman✓

Landscape✗

Air-gapped

Foreman✗

Landscape✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (2)

OpenStack
VMware

Foreman

15 total - 13 not shared

Puppet
Salt
Ansible
MaaS
Amazon EC2
Google Compute Engine
Libvirt
oVirt
LDAP
FreeIPA
Redmine
Discourse
GitHub

Independently observed

Landscape

Leader

6 total - 4 not shared

Azure
AWS
GCP
LXD

Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.