Comparison

firecrawl vs Restfox

On the evidence we track, firecrawl leads this comparison with a composite score of 64/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
firecrawl64
Restfox37
Score
Vioscale score
firecrawl64 / 100medium · 69%
Restfox37 / 100medium · 55%
Pricing
Free tier
firecrawl
Restfox
Model
firecrawlfreemium
Price level
firecrawllow
Restfoxfree
Transparent
firecrawl
Restfox
Integrations
Count
firecrawl6
Restfox2
Adoption
Dependent repos
firecrawl0
Restfox
Github stars
firecrawl172,732
Restfox2,746
Activity
Commits last 30d
firecrawl100
Restfox0
Release
Cadence days
firecrawl15
Restfox8
History
firecrawl20 items
Restfox20 items
License
Spdx
firecrawlAGPL-3.0
RestfoxMIT
Language
Primary
firecrawlTypeScript
RestfoxVue
Market
Availability
Content
Faq
firecrawl8 items
Restfox

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for api development tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
REST client
firecrawl
Restfox
GraphQL support
firecrawl-
Restfox-
gRPC support
firecrawl-
Restfox-
Design
Mock servers
firecrawl-
Restfox-
Testing
Automated / contract testing
firecrawl
Restfox-
Collaboration
Team collaboration & sharing
firecrawl
Restfox-
Docs
Doc generation
firecrawl
Restfox-
Standards
OpenAPI / spec import
firecrawl-
Restfox-
Ops
CI integration / CLI
firecrawl
Restfox

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

firecrawl

Leader

Firecrawl extracts clean, structured web content in various formats, automatically handles JavaScript rendering and dynamic page structures, and supports use cases from research and data extraction to competitive intelligence and content monitoring.

Independently observed

Restfox

A cross-platform API client application for creating, testing, and debugging REST requests, with features including environment variables, response preview, WebSocket support, PDF rendering, and plugin-based scripting capabilities.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

firecrawl

Leader
from $445/moSubscriptionFree tier

Free tier with 1,000 credits/month. Paid plans from Hobby to Enterprise with annual billing. Credits consumed per request: Scrape/Crawl/Map/Monitor = 1 credit/page; Search = 2 credits/10 results; Interact = 2 credits/browser minute.

  • FreeFree
    • Scrape 1,000 pages
    • 2 concurrent requests
    • Low rate limits
  • Hobby5,000 credits/month, billed annually (saves £28)
    • Scrape 5,000 pages
    • 5 concurrent requests
    • Basic support
  • Standard100,000 credits/month, billed annually (saves £147)
    • Scrape 100,000 pages
    • 50 concurrent requests
    • Standard support
  • Growth500,000 credits/month, billed annually (saves £593)
    • Scrape 500,000 pages
    • 100 concurrent requests
    • Priority support
  • Scale£445/month, billed annually (saves £1,337)
    • Scrape 1,000,000 pages
    • 150 concurrent requests
    • Priority support
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • Scrape unlimited pages
    • Custom concurrent requests
    • Dedicated support & SLA
    • Bulk discounts
    • Zero-data retention
    • +1 more
as of verify ↗

Restfox

Open sourceFree tier
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
firecrawl
Restfox
macOS
firecrawl
Restfox
Windows
firecrawl
Restfox
Linux
firecrawl
Restfox
CLI
firecrawl
Restfox
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
firecrawl
Restfox
Self-hosted
firecrawl
Restfox

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

firecrawl

Leader
7 total
  • MCP
  • Claude
  • Cursor
  • Windsurf
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • OpenCode
Independently observed

Restfox

2 total
  • Postman
  • Insomnia
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.