Exoscale vs Hetzner
On the evidence we track, Exoscale leads this comparison with a composite score of 83/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for cloud infrastructure. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Exoscale
LeaderEuropean cloud provider offering compute instances, managed Kubernetes, database services, object and block storage, and GPU servers across multiple European regions.
Hetzner
Hetzner provides hosting and cloud services including bare-metal dedicated servers, flexible cloud instances, managed server solutions, GPU computing, and file storage.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Exoscale
LeaderPay-as-you-go usage-based pricing billed by the second, no upfront costs or commitments. Starting from €0.00729/hour.
- Standard Micro€0.00729/hour
- GPU A30 Small€1.226/hour
Hetzner
Monthly billing; cloud resources billed hourly within monthly invoice. No annual or prepaid options. Auto-renews unless cancelled.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Exoscale
Leader- Rancher
- Terraform
- Kubernetes
- Karpenter
Hetzner
Not documented yet.
Exoscale or Hetzner: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.