Comparison

esbuild vs tsup

No leader: the top candidate esbuild has only 0.21 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
esbuild70
tsup46
Score
Vioscale score
esbuild70 / 100low · 21%
tsup46 / 100low · 21%
Adoption
Dependent repos
esbuild491,246
tsup9,462
Github stars
esbuild40,018
tsup11,291
Activity
Commits last 30d
esbuild34
tsup0
Release
Cadence days
esbuild21
tsup8
History
esbuild20 items
License
Spdx
esbuildMIT
tsupMIT
Language
Primary
esbuildGo

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for bundlers. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capabilities
Dev server hmr
esbuild-
tsup-
Native esm dev
esbuild-
tsup-
Code splitting
esbuild-
tsup-
Tree shaking
esbuild-
tsup-
Css bundling
esbuild-
tsup-
Zero config
esbuild-
tsup-
Webpack plugin compat
esbuild-
tsup-
Rollup plugin compat
esbuild-
tsup-
Monorepo aware
esbuild-
tsup-
Source maps
esbuild-
tsup-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

esbuild

A fast bundler that combines JavaScript and other web assets into optimized output, with built-in TypeScript support and APIs accessible through command-line, JavaScript, and Go interfaces.

Independently observed

tsup

A tool that bundles TypeScript libraries with automatic configuration, supporting Node.js native features and experimental CSS support.

Independently observed

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
CLI
esbuild
tsup

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.