EMQX vs Supabase Realtime
No clear leader: EMQX (53.8) and Supabase Realtime (50.5) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for realtime messaging infra. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
EMQX
An MQTT-based infrastructure platform that enables real-time communication between numerous IoT devices and cloud systems, with built-in data processing, 50+ integrations to enterprise backends, and AI agent capabilities for autonomous device monitoring and control.
Supabase Realtime
A real-time service that synchronizes application state across clients, enabling database change notifications, user presence tracking, and low-latency message broadcasting for collaborative applications.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
EMQX
Free tier available. Tiered subscription model with different SLA levels (99.9% and 99.99%). Pricing not transparently displayed.
- Standard-
- Enterprise-
Supabase Realtime
Pricing not documented yet.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
EMQX
- Microsoft Azure
- Google Cloud
- Oracle Cloud
- AWS
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Google Gemini
- ClickHouse
- Snowflake
- Kafka
- Pulsar
- RabbitMQ
- MySQL
- PostgreSQL
- MongoDB
- InfluxDB
- TDengine
- TimescaleDB
- BigQuery
- S3
- Azure Blob
- Confluent Cloud
- Webhook
Supabase Realtime
Not documented yet.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.