EMQX vs Procore
On the evidence we track, EMQX leads this comparison with a composite score of 64/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Features
The capabilities each product documents. These tools do not share a category taxonomy, so this aligns what each vendor states rather than a normalised feature set.
| Feature | EMQX | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting erp | - | ✓ |
| Aia g702 g703 progress billing | - | ✗ |
| Automated addenda and revision notifications | - | ✓ |
| Bim ifc | - | none |
| Certified payroll davis bacon reporting | - | ✗ |
| Change order revenue impact budgeting | - | ✓ |
| Delivery guarantee | exactly-once | - |
| Deployment model | - | cloud_web_app |
| Digital plan room document distribution | - | ✓ |
| Direct integration to construction erp project management | - | ✓ |
| Diversity and inclusion mwbe tracking | - | ✗ |
| Document control | - | ✓ |
| Equipment depreciation and usage cost allocation | - | ✓ |
| Estimating takeoff | - | ✗ |
| Global edge network | ✓ | - |
| Granular phase and cost code budget tracking | - | ✓ |
| Historical subcontractor performance scoring | - | ✗ |
| Iso 19650 | - | ✗ |
| Iso 27001 | - | ✗ |
| Mass itb invitation to bid email blasting | - | ✗ |
| Mobile support | - | mobile |
| Mqtt support | ✓ | - |
| Offline reconnect catchup | ✓ | - |
| Pricing model | connections-metered | acv_volume |
| Primary module | - | suite |
| Public open project lead bulletin boards | - | ✗ |
| Purchase order and subcontract management | - | ✓ |
| Retainage withholding tracking | - | ✗ |
| Rfi submittal | - | ✓ |
| Safety quality | - | ✓ |
| Scaling model | native-cluster | - |
| Scheduling | - | ✗ |
| Self hostable | ✓ | - |
| Side by side bid leveling comparison | - | ✗ |
| Soc2 | - | ✗ |
| Soc2 type ii | - | ✗ |
| Subcontractor prequalification and compliance | - | ✗ |
| Target segment | - | gc |
| Union payroll complex fringe deductions | - | ✗ |
| Wip work in progress over under billing reporting | - | ✗ |
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
EMQX
LeaderAn enterprise MQTT broker and platform that enables scalable, real-time data collection and routing from IoT devices across edge, cloud, and on-premises deployments. It provides native integrations with AI platforms, databases, and cloud services, along with advanced features like rule engines and flexible authentication.
Procore
End-to-end construction project management platform that manages projects from preconstruction to closeout with AI-powered agents, real-time collaboration, and integrated cost and resource management.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
EMQX
LeaderFrom free tier to $234/month managed, or custom enterprise pricing
- ServerlessFree
- Up to 1000 connections
- TLS/SSL encryption
- Basic monitoring & alerts
- 8/5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month with included traffic allowance
- Dedicated isolated cluster
- VPC peering & private link
- 40+ integrations
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- 24/7 premium support
- BYOCContact sales
- Deployed in your VPC
- Custom data plane & control plane
- Managed upgrades and observability
- Compliance tailored to your needs
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Deploy anywhere (on-prem, edge, cloud)
- Custom plugins & extensions
- Professional services
- Priority feature requests
Procore
Custom ACV-based pricing with unlimited users, data, and support. Field Productivity available with FTE-based pricing.
- Custom (ACV-based)Contact sales
- Unlimited users across all stakeholders
- Unlimited data storage for documents and files
- Unlimited 24/7 technical support
- Product enhancements at no additional cost
- 18 on-demand role-based certifications
- +2 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
EMQX
Leader- Microsoft Azure
- Google Cloud
- Oracle Cloud
- AWS
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Google Gemini
- ClickHouse
- Snowflake
- Kafka
- Pulsar
- RabbitMQ
- MySQL
- PostgreSQL
- MongoDB
- InfluxDB
- TDengine
- TimescaleDB
- BigQuery
- S3
- Azure Blob
- Confluent Cloud
- Webhook
- Amazon S3
- +1 more
Procore
- Databricks
- Power BI
- DocuSign
- Power BI Desktop
EMQX or Procore: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.