Duplicati vs restic
On the evidence we track, Duplicati leads this comparison with a composite score of 53/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for backup recovery. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Duplicati
LeaderAn open-source backup platform that encrypts and stores data across multiple cloud and on-premises storage options, with centralized management for backing up local machines, servers, and cloud services.
restic
A command-line backup utility that emphasizes speed, security, and efficient storage through data deduplication and encryption, with support for Linux, macOS, Windows, and various storage backends including cloud services.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- SFTP
Duplicati
Leader- AWS S3
- Azure Blob Storage
- Wasabi Hot Storage
- Backblaze B2
- Microsoft 365
- Google Workspace
- SMB
- Duplicati Storage
- WebDAV
restic
- Google Cloud Storage
- Microsoft Azure Blob Storage
Duplicati or restic: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.