Driver.js vs Shepherd.js
On the evidence we track, Shepherd.js leads this comparison with a composite score of 52/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for digital adoption platforms. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Driver.js
A lightweight, open-source JavaScript library that enables developers to build interactive product tours, highlights, and contextual guidance overlays for web applications. It works across all major browsers and mobile devices with minimal setup and no external dependencies.
Shepherd.js
LeaderA JavaScript library for building guided tours and onboarding experiences within web applications. Emphasizes accessibility, framework compatibility (React, Angular, Vue, Ember), and customizable styling.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Driver.js
Free and open source under MIT license
- Open SourceFree
- Product tours
- User onboarding
- Works with any framework
- Vanilla JavaScript support
- Mobile device compatible
Shepherd.js
LeaderPricing not documented yet.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Driver.js
- React
Shepherd.js
LeaderNot documented yet.
Driver.js or Shepherd.js: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.