dify vs ECC
On the evidence we track, dify leads this comparison with a composite score of 68/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Features
The capabilities each product documents. These tools do not share a category taxonomy, so this aligns what each vendor states rather than a normalised feature set.
| Feature | dify | ECC |
|---|---|---|
| Bring your own key byok for llm inference | ✓ | - |
| Builder ui architecture | visual_node_canvas | - |
| Custom http webhook catch and triggering | ✓ | - |
| Dynamic conditional routing via llm classification | ✓ | - |
| Human in the loop approval steps via slack email | ✓ | - |
| Iso 27001 | ✓ | - |
| Native llm nodes anthropic openai gemini | ✓ | - |
| On premise self hosted deployment option | ✓ | - |
| Pricing model | freemium_with_task_credits | - |
| Soc2 type ii | ✓ | - |
| Sub workflow calling and reusable templates | ✓ | - |
| Unstructured document extraction pdf image to json | ✓ | - |
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
dify
LeaderAn open-source LLM application development platform that enables teams to build, test, and deploy AI-powered workflows, RAG pipelines, and autonomous agents using a visual interface, with support for multiple language models, enterprise security features, and flexible deployment options.
ECC
A toolkit and GitHub App that establish a shared operating layer for coding agents, enabling unified skills, memory systems, planning tools, and security scanning across multiple IDEs and repository workflows.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
dify
LeaderFreemium: Sandbox and Community free. Professional from $590/year per workspace.
- SandboxFree
- 5 Apps
- 50 Knowledge Documents
- 50MB Storage
- 30 Days Log History
- Professional$590/workspace/year
- 1 Team Workspace
- 50 Apps
- Priority Document Processing
- Unlimited Triggers per Workflow
- Faster Workflow Execution
- +2 more
- Team$1590/year
- 200 Apps
- 1000 Knowledge Documents
- Unlimited Trigger Events
- Top Priority Document Processing
- Priority Workflow Execution
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Enterprise-grade Scalable Deployment
- Commercial License
- Multiple Workspaces
- SSO
- Advanced Security & Controls
- +1 more
- CommunityFree
- All Core Features
- Single Workspace
- Open Source License
ECC
Free for open-source; Pro from $19/seat/month for private repos; Enterprise custom pricing
- FreeFree
- Public repository GitHub App analysis
- Issue-comment triggered pull requests
- MIT-licensed open-source toolkit
- Community support
- Skills, agents, hooks, and learning system
- Pro$19/seat/month or $190/seat/year; pooled usage with optional metered overage
- Private repository analysis and PR-triggered audits
- AgentShield configuration and harness security scanning
- Auto-triggers on large pushes and pull requests
- Pooled usage across team seats
- Optional metered overage for high-volume workspaces
- +3 more
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Unlimited analyses
- SSO-ready governance and audit logs
- Custom rules and policy packs
- Dedicated onboarding and SLA
- Organization-wide rollout and procurement support
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
dify
Leader- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Gemini
- xAI
- DeepSeek
- Tongyi
- MCP
- Google Gemini
- Alibaba Tongyi
- Google Search
- DALL-E
- Stable Diffusion
- WolframAlpha
ECC
- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- OpenCode
- GitHub
- Anthropic Claude API
- Cloudflare
- Stripe
- Kimi Code
- Itô
- Atlas Cloud
dify or ECC: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.