conventional-changelog vs semantic-release
No clear leader: semantic-release (59.0) and conventional-changelog (55.0) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for changelog tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
conventional-changelog
An open-source toolkit that automatically generates changelogs and release notes by analyzing a project's commit messages and metadata, typically following the conventional commits standard.
semantic-release
A tool that analyzes commit history to automatically determine the next semantic version, generate release notes, and publish packages to package managers, supporting any language or package manager.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- npm
- GitHub Actions
conventional-changelog
- Git
- GitHub
- pnpm
- semantic-release
- commit-and-tag-version
- simple-release-action
semantic-release
- commitizen
- commitlint
conventional-changelog or semantic-release: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.