conventional-changelog vs git-cliff
No clear leader: conventional-changelog (55.0) and git-cliff (50.7) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for changelog tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
conventional-changelog
An open-source toolkit that automatically generates changelogs and release notes by analyzing a project's commit messages and metadata, typically following the conventional commits standard.
git-cliff
Generates changelogs from Git repositories with support for conventional commits and custom regex-powered parsing rules, fully configurable through configuration files.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- GitHub
conventional-changelog
- Git
- npm
- pnpm
- GitHub Actions
- semantic-release
- commit-and-tag-version
- simple-release-action
git-cliff
- GitLab
- Gitea
- Bitbucket
- Azure DevOps
- Rust
- Python
conventional-changelog or git-cliff: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.