Comparison

Consensus vs Elicit

On the evidence we track, Elicit leads this comparison with a composite score of 76/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Consensus48
Elicit76
Score
Vioscale score
Consensus48 / 100low · 36%
Elicit76 / 100low · 37%
Pricing
Free tier
Consensus
Elicit
Model
Consensusfreemium
Elicitfreemium
Price level
Consensuslow
Elicitlow
Starting price
Consensus
Elicit$11
Transparent
Consensus
Elicit
Integrations
Count
Consensus5
Elicit1
Security
Gdpr
Consensus
Elicit

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ai research agents. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capabilities
Architecture model
ConsensusManaged saas application
ElicitManaged saas application
Recursive multi step iterative searching
Consensus
Elicit
Strict inline citation generation with links
Consensus
Elicit
Academic verified journal database querying only
Consensus
Elicit
Unstructured PDF upload and cross document synthesis
Consensus-
Elicit
Tabular data extraction and literature matrix generation
Consensus-
Elicit
Anti hallucination grounding and fact checking layer
Consensus
Elicit
Multi agent expert persona debates internal
Consensus-
Elicit
Export to word PDF markdown with bibliography
Consensus
Elicit
Bring your own key byok API support
Consensus-
Elicit
SOC2 type ii
Consensus-
Elicit
Mit or apache permissive oss license
Consensus-
Elicit
Pricing model
Consensus-
ElicitFlat monthly subscription

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Consensus

Consensus helps researchers, clinicians, and students quickly find answers by searching through 220+ million peer-reviewed studies and using AI to synthesize findings with linked citations. Users can verify sources themselves by examining the original research, methodology, and study conclusions.

Independently observed

Elicit

Leader

Elicit helps researchers search millions of academic papers and clinical trials to automatically generate structured, cited research reports and support systematic literature reviews with interactive analysis tools.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Consensus

HybridFree tier

Free tier available. Paid plans available. API pricing from $0.10 per call plus platform fee.

  • FreeFree
    • Search peer-reviewed research
    • AI-powered synthesis
    • Citation linking
  • Paid-
as of verify ↗

Elicit

Leader
from $11/seat/moSubscriptionFree tier

From free with limited features to $89/user/month; free tier available

  • BasicFree
    • Limited usage for Research Agent and Research Reports
    • Unlimited search across 138M+ papers
    • Unlimited summaries
    • Unlimited chat with papers with full-text access
    • View sources for answers
    • +1 more
  • Plus$11/user/month billed annually as $132/year (saves 42%)
    • Standard usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
    • Unlimited search across 138M+ papers and 500k+ clinical trials
    • Export to RIS, CSV, BIB, PDF, DOCX
    • Add 5 columns to tables
    • Import from Zotero
  • Pro$39/user/month billed annually as $468/year (saves 43%)
    • 5x usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
    • Dedicated Systematic Review Workflow for 5,000 papers
    • Export to RIS, CSV, BIB, PDF, DOCX
    • Add 20 columns to tables
    • Extract from up to 135 data sources
    • +5 more
  • Scale$89/user/month billed annually as $1,068/year (saves 40%)
    • 9x usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
    • Extract and interpret figures from research papers
    • Live editing and real-time collaboration
    • Extract from up to 200 data sources
    • Add 30 columns to tables
    • +2 more
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • Custom usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
    • Unlimited paper alerts
    • No training on your data by default
    • Screen 40,000 papers and extract 40 columns
    • PRISMA-grade screening and extraction accuracy
    • +6 more
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Consensus
Elicit
iOS
Consensus
Elicit
Android
Consensus
Elicit
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Consensus
Elicit

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (1)
  • Zotero

Consensus

5 total - 4 not shared
  • OpenAI
  • ChatGPT
  • Mendeley
  • EndNote
Independently observed

Elicit

Leader
1 total - 0 not shared
  • Zotero
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.