Codeberg vs Gitea
No clear leader: Codeberg (57.8) and Gitea (56.4) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for version control. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Codeberg
A volunteer-run platform offering free infrastructure services—including code repositories, CI/CD pipelines, and project hosting—exclusively for free and open-source software projects.
Gitea
Gitea is an open-source DevOps platform that provides Git repository hosting, code review, CI/CD pipelines via integrated Gitea Actions, and multi-format package management. It supports both cloud-hosted and self-managed deployments on Linux, Windows, macOS, and Kubernetes.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Gitea
Free open-source tier or from $9.50/user/month for enterprise
- Open SourceFree
- Code hosting
- Issue tracking
- Pull requests
- Project management
- Gitea Actions (CI/CD)
- +2 more
- EnterpriseFrom $9.50/user/month (1-year annual commitment)
- All Free features
- SAML SSO Integration
- Audit Logs
- Kubernetes AutoScaling Runners
- Priority security bug fix notifications
- +3 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Codeberg
- Forgejo
- Woodpecker CI
- Weblate
Gitea
- GitHub Actions
- Slack
- Cargo
- Chef
- Composer
- Conan
- Conda
- Container
- Helm
- Maven
- NPM
- NuGet
- Pub
- PyPI
- RubyGems
- Vagrant
- SQLite
- MySQL
- PostgreSQL
- TiDB
- MS SQL
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.