Clipy vs GPaste
No leader: the top candidate Clipy has only 0.10 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for clipboard managers. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Clipy
A clipboard extension for macOS that maintains a history of copied content in multiple formats and allows users to save and quickly insert reusable text templates through keyboard shortcuts.
GPaste
Open-source clipboard management system that runs as a daemon and stores your copy history with support for text, images, and rich content. Includes a GTK 4 interface, GNOME Shell extension, and command-line tools.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Clipy
Not documented yet.
GPaste
- GNOME Shell
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.