Comparison

Clio vs Everlaw

On the evidence we track, Clio leads this comparison with a composite score of 69/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Clio69
Everlaw62
Score
Vioscale score
Clio69 / 100medium · 70%
Everlaw62 / 100medium · 73%
Pricing
Free tier
Clio
Everlaw
Model
Price level
Cliomid
Everlawunknown
Transparent
Clio
Everlaw
Integrations
Count
Clio50
Everlaw7
Security
Disclosure policy
Clio
Everlaw
Fedramp
Clio
Everlaw
Gdpr
Clio
Everlaw
Iso27001
Clio
Everlaw
Pci
Clio
Everlaw
Soc2
Clio
Everlaw
Reliability
Sla pct
Clio
Everlaw99.95
Status page
Clio
Everlaw

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for legal software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
Product type
ClioPractice management
EverlawE-discovery
CLM
Contract authoring / templates
Clio-
Everlaw
Negotiation / redlining
Clio-
Everlaw
Contract repository
ClioNone
EverlawNone
Obligation / renewal tracking
Clio-
Everlaw
AI
AI contract review / drafting
Clio-
EverlawFull review + drafting
E-signature
E-signature legal validity
Clio-
EverlawNone
E-discovery
E-discovery
Clio-
EverlawFull EDRM (processing to production)
Legal hold / chain of custody
Clio-
Everlaw
Integrations
Word / Outlook add-ins
Clio-
Everlaw
Document-store integrations
Clio
Everlaw
SSO / SCIM
Clio-
Everlaw-
API access
Clio-
EverlawNone
Compliance
Data residency
Clio-
EverlawFedRAMP Moderate compliant

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Clio

Leader

A practice management system that helps law firms organize cases, track billable time, manage tasks and deadlines, and communicate securely with clients. The platform integrates with over 50 third-party applications to extend functionality.

Independently observed

Everlaw

A cloud-based platform that helps legal teams streamline document discovery, automate review workflows, and analyze evidence using generative AI to accelerate case development and litigation.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Clio

Leader
from $49/moSubscription30-day trial

From $49/user/mo. Free 30-day trial.

  • Starter$49/user/mo
    • Store and manage every contact, matter, and document
    • Track time and expenses from anywhere
    • Client online payments (card, eCheck, Apple Pay, Google Pay)
    • Trust and operating account reconciliation
  • Core-
    • Everything in Starter, plus:
    • AI-drafted billing on schedule
    • Documents to calendar events and tasks
    • Automatic client updates from case activity
    • Secure client portal
  • Signature-
    • Everything in Core, plus:
    • Unlimited custom roles and permissions
    • Kanban board with matter stages
    • AI reports on profitability and productivity
    • Multi-currency billing
as of verify ↗

Everlaw

Subscription

Subscription-based, per-GB data pricing with unlimited user seats. Includes core features and single-document AI actions. Batch AI operations require additional credits.

  • Platform SubscriptionContact sales
    • Unlimited user licenses
    • Legal holds and chain of custody
    • Native support for Slack, Teams, iMessage, WhatsApp, and other novel data types
    • Redaction and data masking tools
    • Processing and imaging
    • +10 more
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Clio
Everlaw
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Clio
Everlaw

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Clio

Leader
6 total
  • Apptoto
  • Nextchapter
  • Legalist
  • Clause
  • LawLytics
  • CyphraTek
Independently observed

Everlaw

9 total
  • Microsoft
  • Google
  • Slack
  • Zoom
  • Microsoft 365
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Google Workspace
  • iMessage
  • WhatsApp
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.