Comparison

Chocolatey vs uv

On the evidence we track, uv leads this comparison with a composite score of 67/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Chocolatey53
uv67
Score
Vioscale score
Chocolatey53 / 100medium · 56%
uv67 / 100high · 77%
Pricing
Free tier
Chocolatey
uv
Model
Price level
Chocolateymid
Transparent
Chocolatey
uv
Integrations
Count
Chocolatey3
uv17
Reliability
Status page
Chocolatey
uv
Adoption
Dependent repos
Chocolatey110
uv2
Github stars
Chocolatey11,495
Package downloads weekly
Chocolatey
Activity
Commits last 30d
Chocolatey7
uv100
Release
Cadence days
Chocolatey21
uv3
History
Chocolatey20 items
License
Spdx
Chocolatey
Language
Primary
ChocolateyC#
Market

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for package registries. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
Role
ChocolateyPackage manager client
uvPackage manager client
Ecosystem
Ecosystem / language
ChocolateyOS-level
uvPython
Deployment
Deployment
ChocolateyBoth
uvCLI-local
Formats
Package formats supported
ChocolateyMany formats
uvMany formats
Hosting
Private / scoped packages
Chocolatey
uv-
Upstream proxy / caching
Chocolatey
uv-
Resolution
Lockfile / deterministic installs
Chocolatey-
uv
Workspaces / monorepo
Chocolatey-
uv
Content-addressable store
Chocolatey-
uv-
Supply chain
Supply-chain integrity
Chocolatey
uv
Vulnerability / licence scanning
Chocolatey
uv-
Licensing
Openness
ChocolateyOpen-core
uvOpen-source
Pricing
Pricing model
ChocolateyPer-seat
uvFree / OSS

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Chocolatey

Chocolatey is a command-line package manager for Windows that simplifies software deployment and lifecycle management. It offers both free open-source capabilities and commercial enterprise editions with advanced features like central management and package auditing.

Independently observed

uv

Leader

A unified command-line tool that consolidates the functionality of multiple Python package management and development utilities into a single interface. It delivers substantially faster dependency resolution and installation compared to traditional package managers.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Chocolatey

from $18/moHybridFree tier

Free open source tier. Pro $96/year for individuals (up to 8 machines). Business from $18/node/year with volume discounts.

  • Open SourceFree
    • Unlimited machines
    • Create packages
    • Host own package repository
    • Third-party tool integration
    • Package shims
    • +3 more
  • Pro$96/year for up to 8 machines
    • All open source features
    • Enhanced functionality
    • Additional PowerShell functions
    • Package reducer
    • Package throttle
    • +2 more
  • Business (C4B)From $18/node/year (100-node minimum). Volume discounts and perpetual licensing available.
    • All Pro features
    • Central management dashboard
    • Self-service package installation
    • Full package synchronization
    • Package internalizer
    • +3 more
as of verify ↗

uv

Leader
Open sourceFree tier
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
macOS
Chocolatey
uv
Windows
Chocolatey
uv
Linux
Chocolatey
uv
CLI
Chocolatey
uv
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Chocolatey
uv
Self-hosted
Chocolatey
uv
On-premise
Chocolatey
uv

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Chocolatey

3 total
  • Puppet
  • SCCM
  • Intune
Independently observed

uv

Leader
10 total
  • Docker
  • GitHub Actions
  • GitLab CI/CD
  • AWS Lambda
  • Azure Artifacts
  • AWS CodeArtifact
  • JFrog Artifactory
  • PyTorch
  • FastAPI
  • Jupyter
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.