Checkly vs Uptime Kuma
On the evidence we track, Checkly leads this comparison with a composite score of 71/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for api monitoring. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Checkly
LeaderPlatform for monitoring web applications and APIs using synthetic testing from multiple geographic regions and private network locations. Includes public status page hosting and automated incident alerting.
Uptime Kuma
A self-hosted monitoring solution that tracks the availability of websites and services across multiple protocols and endpoints, with flexible alerting through numerous notification channels.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Slack
- Telegram
Checkly
Leader- PagerDuty
- Incident.io
- Rootly
- OpsGenie
- GitHub
- GitHub Actions
- GitLab CI
- Jenkins
- Vercel
- Terraform
- Pulumi
- Webhook
- Airflow
- Kubernetes
- MCP
- Prometheus
- Webhooks
Uptime Kuma
- Discord
- Gotify
- Pushover
Checkly or Uptime Kuma: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.