vioscale
Comparison

Check Point CloudGuard vs Lacework

No leader: the top candidate Lacework has only 0.27 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.

Check Point CloudGuard full profile →Lacework full profile →
Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Check Point CloudGuard49
Lacework60
Score
Vioscale score
Check Point CloudGuard49 / 100low · 11%updating
Lacework60 / 100low · 27%updating
Pricing
Model
Check Point CloudGuardcommercial
Laceworkcommercial
Security
Iso27001
Check Point CloudGuard–
Lacework✓
Soc2
Check Point CloudGuard–
Lacework✓
Reliability
Status page
Check Point CloudGuard✓
Lacework✓
Market
Availability
Check Point CloudGuardAvailable worldwide · HQ IL
Lacework–

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for cloud security software. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Posture
CSPM (posture / misconfig)
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-
KSPM (Kubernetes posture)
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-
Workload
CWPP (workload protection)
Check Point CloudGuard✓
Lacework-
Entitlements
CIEM (entitlements)
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-
Data
DSPM (data posture)
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-
Pipeline
IaC / pipeline scanning
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-
Architecture
Agentless scanning
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-
Runtime
Runtime protection
Check Point CloudGuard✓
Lacework-
Coverage
Cloud coverage
Check Point CloudGuardMulti-cloud
Lacework-
Compliance
Compliance frameworks assessed
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-
Licensing
Open-core scanner available
Check Point CloudGuard-
Lacework-

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Check Point CloudGuard✓
Lacework–

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.