BullMQ vs Trigger.dev
No clear leader: BullMQ (60.9) and Trigger.dev (59.5) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for message queues. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
BullMQ
An open source system for queueing and processing background tasks using Redis as the data store, with support for Node.js, Python, Rust, Elixir, and PHP applications.
Trigger.dev
A cloud service that executes durable, serverless tasks and AI agents with built-in retry logic, observability, and automatic scaling. Code runs without timeouts on managed infrastructure, with state preserved across execution pauses and failures.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Trigger.dev
Free tier available. From $10/month for Hobby tier; Pro starts at $50/month with usage-based overage pricing.
- FreeFree
- Dev and Prod environments
- Community support
- 1 day log retention
- Hobby$10/month
- Dev, Preview and Prod environments
- Community support
- 7 day log retention
- ProFrom $50/month
- Dev, Preview and Prod environments
- Dedicated Slack support
- 30 day log retention
- EnterpriseContact sales
- All Pro plan features
- Custom log retention
- Priority support
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- SOC 2 report
- +2 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
BullMQ
Not documented yet.
Trigger.dev
- Prisma
- OpenAI
- Resend
- Vercel
- GitHub
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.